Nugget 16: WORKS Commons Now has a Working Agentic Interviewer.
Below is a sample of the serialized interview metadata.
I’ve learned a lot building this. I love it.
Model prompt engineering is part discipline, part art. Good practices are essential to reduce hallucinations.
A strong prompt must:
- Define clear instructions and rules- Specify how the data should be used
- Establish boundaries and limitations
- Explicitly describe the data schemas involved
Anything outside those boundaries should be treated as: “I do not know.”
Clarity here matters. A lot.
WORKS Commons does not rely on HITL (Human-in-the-Loop) to mitigate hallucinations.
When we use generative tools and push back in the editor—adding constraints, refining instructions—we are participating in the generation process. We reclaim some agency.
WORKS Commons takes a different route.
A Quality Gate is in the works.
The Gate
In the service orchestration the gate will evaluate:- Response quality
- Confidence in the analysis
- Risk of hallucination
If the response meets the criteria for a “good model response,” it passes through.
If there is even a small suspicion of hallucination, the system triggers a retry loop—with an improved prompt.
It smells like HITL… but it isn’t. It’s fully automated.
The Gate will not loop infinitely. No.
If repeated attempts still produce weak responses, the result is returned to the client—with a warning. The client must learn to handle that reality.
AI is not magic. It is human-engineered.
And because of that, it can be understood, shaped, and improved.

Comments
Post a Comment